Interpretation of Evidence: The Key to Conveying Information to Court
محتوى المقال
الملخص
Abstract
The advent of new technologies such as DNA typing, the weight
of scientific evidence in criminal trials of widespread publicity, and
the proliferation of fictional and non-fictional works in popular media
have contributed to making forensic science well known, although
perhaps not as well understood, by the general public. One
of the consequences of this popularisation of forensic science was a
sharp change in the attitude of investigators, who increasingly tend
to delegate to scientists the collection of information necessary to
identify the perpetrator of the crime. However, the prominent focus
on the search of biological traces or fingerprints, due to their high
potential for the personal identification of the individuals present at
the crime scene, somewhat fade the interest towards other kinds of
evidence, such as trace evidence. This kind of evidence is in fact
perceived by judges and lawyers as less informative, because they
think that “all plastic items are the same”, i.e. that it is impossible to
discriminate among mass produced items. The purpose of this paper
is to stress that, with sound methods for interpreting evidence, it
is possible to improve the communication between the scientist and
the Court, and to show the real significance of the analytical results,
in the context of the case.
The analysis of the traces found on a knife used in a murder
case were performed by optical microscopy, IR spectroscopy, and
UV-visible spectroscopy. The interpretation of evidence was carried
out according to a Bayesian approach.
A description of the interpretation of evidence in a case in
which fibres were the key evidence. It is shown that the key aspects
for having a high value of the evidence are the circumstances of the
case and the reconstruction of the events given by the prosecutor
and by the defence, in addition of course to a sound analytical procedure.
In other words, it is shown that in some cases the evidential
value of fibres or other trace evidence can be very high, sometimes
comparable to that of fingerprints or DNA: when properly interpreted,
trace evidence can give key information for solving cases.
الكلمات المفتاحية
Forensic Science، Fibres، Polymers، Trace Evidence، Interpretation، Bayes Theorem، Court.
التنزيلات
المراجع
Aitken C., Taroni F. Statistics and the Evaluation of
Evidence for Forensic Scientists, 2nd Edition. Wiley,Hoboken,
https://doi.org/10.1002/0470011238
Champod C, Taroni F. Bayesian framework for
the evaluation of fibre transfer evidence. Sci Justice.
;37(2):75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-
(97)72151-8
Curran JM, Hicks TN, Buckleton JS, Interpretation of
glass evidence. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2000.
Doheny and Adams case, 1997 1 Cr.App.R. 369.
Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ, Lambert JA. A
hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address
in casework. Sci Justice 1998;38:231. https://doi.
org/10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72117-3
Causin V, Schiavone S, Marigo A, Carresi P. Bayesian
framework for the evaluation fo fiber evidence
in a double murder – a case report. Forensic Sci
Int. 2004;141:159-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
forsciint.2004.01.009
Cantrell S, Roux C, Maynard P, Robertson J. A textile
fibre survey as an aid to the interpretation of fibre
evidence in the Sydney region. Forensic sci int.
;123(1):48-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-
(01)00520-5
Grieve MC. A survey on the evidential value of fibres
and on the interpretation of the findings in fibre
transfer cases. Part 1–fibre frequencies. Sci Justice.
;40(3):189-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-
(00)71975-7
Grieve MC, Biermann T. The population of coloured
textile fibres on outdoor surfaces. Sci Justice.
;37(4):231-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-
(97)72196-8
Jones J, Coyle T. Synthetic flock fibres: a population
and target fibre study. Sci Justice. 2011;51(2):68-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2010.10.004
Kelly E, Griffin RM. A target fibre study on seats in
public houses. Sci justice. 1998;38(1):39-44. https://
doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72071-4
Marnane RN, Elliot DA, Coulson SA. A pilot study
to determine the background population of foreign fibre
groups on a cotton/polyester T-shirt. Sci Justice.
;46(4):215-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-
(06)71601-X
Palmer R, Oliver S. The population of coloured fibres in
human head hair. Sci justice. 2004;44(2):83-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(04)71693-7
Roux C, Margot P. An attempt to assess the relevance
of textile fibres recovered from car seats. Sci Justice.
;37(4):225-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-
(97)72195-6
Roux C, Margot P. The population of textile fibres on
car seats. Sci Justice. 1997;37(1):25-30. https://doi.
org/10.1016/S1355-0306(97)72137-3
Watt RT, Roux CP, Robertson J. The population of coloured
textile fibres in domestic washing machines. Sci
Justice. 2005;45(2):75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-
(05)71632-4
Grieve MC, Biermann TW, Davignon M. The evidential
value of black cotton fibres. Sci Justice. 2001;41(4):245-
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(01)71908-9
Grieve MC, Biermann TW, Davignon M. The evidential
value of black cotton fibres. Sci Justice. 2001;41(4):245-
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(01)71908-9
Grieve MC, Biermann TW, Schaub K. The individuality
of fibres used to provide forensic evidence--not all blue
polyesters are the same. Sci justice. 2005;45(1):13-28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(05)71616-6
Palmer R, Hutchinson W, Fryer V. The discrimination
of (non-denim) blue cotton. Sci Justice. 2009;49(1):12-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2008.07.001
Biermann TW. Blocks of colour IV: the evidential value
of blue and red cotton fibres. Sci Justice. 2007;47(2):68-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2006.08.001
De Wael K, Baes C, Lepot L, Gason F. On the frequency
of occurrence of a peculiar polyester fibre type found
in blue denim textiles. Sci Justice. 2011;51(4):154-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2011.02.001
Causin V. Polymers on the Crime Scene - Forensic
Analysis of Polymeric Trace Evidence. Springer, New
York, 2015.
Pian et al.