Frequency of Mamelons in Relation to Age, Gender and Occlusion among the Saudi Population
Article content
Abstract
This observational study aimed to determine the prevalence and identify the presence of mamelons while simultaneously correlating the age, gender, and bite relationship of the subjects.
Total sample size included 518 patients, both males and females. Study participants were selected by systematic random sampling using the randomizer.org website. Clinical examination as well as the presence of mamelons on each jaw and the relationship of anterior teeth such as open bite, functional contact, or not were screened by trained personnel performed by using a mouth mirror, latex gloves, a dental probe, and a dental chair light.
256 (49.4%) males and 262 (50.5%) females participated in this study. It was observed that the presence of mamelons was more frequent among females (84.7%) rather than males (79.3%). During the first decade of life, the percentage of mamelons is higher, irrespective of gender. However, the frequency and percentage of mamelons start to decrease with age. Mamelons are more prevalent in an open bite occlusion (90.0%) followed by a non-functional occlusion, i.e., 81.7% (edge to edge relation) and then a functional occlusion, i.e., 75.5%.
Persistence of mamelons in either gender is higher up to the age of 25 years, afterward mamelons dramatically reduce. Additionally, mamelons appear more in maxillary incisors than mandible incisors.
Keywords
Forensic Science, Mamelons, Age, Gender, Occlusal Relationship
Downloads
References
Bird D, Robinson D. Torres and Ehrlich Modern Dental Assisting 9th. Louis, MO: Mosby. 2009.
Chaudhary RK, Doggalli N. Commonly used different dental age estimation methods in children and adolescents. International Journal of Forensic Odontology. 2018; 3(2):50.
Savita J, Kumar BY, Mamatha N. Teeth as age estimation tool in children and adolescents. Journal of Medicine, Radiology, Pathology and Surgery. 2017; 4(4):12-15.
Clayton L. Taber’s. Cyclopedic medical dictionary. 1997; 18.
Gorea R, Agnihotry A, Aggarwal B. Forensic evaluation of Mamelons on the incisors. Journal Indo-Pacific Academy of Forensic Odontology Vol. 2010; 1:2.
Fehrenbach MJ, Popowics T. Illustrated dental embryology, histology, and anatomy: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.
Nelson SJ. Wheeler's Dental Anatomy, Physiology and Occlusion-E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
Grawish ME, Grawish LM, Grawish HM. Permanent Maxillary and Mandibular Incisors. Dental Anatomy: IntechOpen; 2017.
Hillson S, Grigson C, Bond S. Dental defects of congenital syphilis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists. 1998; 107(1):25-40.
Moyers R. Handbook of Orthodontics Chicago: Year Book Publication. Inc; 1958.
Bagh T, Chatra L, Shenai P, Veena K, Rao K, Prabhu V, et al. Age estimation using Cameriere’s seven teeth method with Indian specific formula in south Indian children. Int J Adv Health Sci. 2014; 1(2):2-10.
Acharya AB. Age Estimation in Indians Using Demirjian’s 8-teeth Method. Journal of forensic sciences. 2011 Jan;56(1):124-7.
Article details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You must read and accept the copyright terms and conditions(click here for copyright terms).