The Language of Forensic Experts: A Commentary on the Sally Clark Case ]1999-2002
Article content
Abstract
According to the judge, jury and the public in the UK, Sally
Clark murdered her two sons. The prosecution forensic expert had
submitted his evidence using complex medical and scientific language
that misled the jury. The defence expert failed to challenge
him. A few years later, Mrs. Clark was proven innocent, as there was
undisclosed evidence and the language of the prosecution forensic
expert misled the jury. This paper raises some issues according to
the Sally Clark case. It includes some discussions about the expert’s
role in the adversarial system and also compares it with the inquisitorial
system. It is an approach towards understanding whether the
expert should stand in the witness box or not. This paper answers
whether the decision in the Sally Clark would have taken a different
direction, if it was dealt under the inquisitorial justice system
or other experts’ systems. Although this case has helped to re-open
many other cases, it has not encouraged the English criminal justice
system to make any changes with the expert system (especially in
complex forensic cases). It also affected experts who now think that
testifying in court is a risk. This paper presents a new approach that,
if considered, can protect the justice system from any miscarriages,
the experts themselves from being blamed and the public who look
at both as killers.
Keywords
Forensic Science, Forensic Evidence, Sally Clark, Criminal Justice, Experts, Language.
Downloads
References
R v. Sally Clark. EWCA Crim, 1020. [2003] The
Guardian, January 30, [2003] The Independent, January
(2003).
Wooffinden, B. “Tests `Show mother did not kill sons`,
Guardian Unlimited, 3rd July (2002).
Aitken, C. Roberts, P. Jackson, G, Fundamental of
Probabilities and Statistical Evidence in Criminal Proceedings,
Royal Statistical Society.
Sweeney, J. Law. B. “Gene find casts doubt on double
`Cot Death` murders”, Gurdian Unlimited, 15th July,
Meadow, R. Mok, J, Rosenberg R, ABC of Child Protection,
Blackwell, 4th Edition, 2007. https://books.
google.co.uk/books?id=SD2ekxbHzaUC&printsec=fro
ntcover#v=onepage&q&f=false 6.12pm 8/10/2018.
Folks v. Chadd [1782] 3 Dong, 157.
Johnston PL. Court-appointed scientific expert witnesses:
Unfettering expertise. High Tech. LJ. 1987;2:249.
Howard MN. THE NEUTRAL EXPERT-A PLAUSIBLE
THREAT TO JUSTICE. Crim L Rev. 1991 Feb
:98-105.
Eggleston R. What is wrong with the adversary system?.
AUSTL. LJ. 1975;49:428-31.
Sommer P. Meetings between experts: A route to
simpler, fairer trials?. digital investigation. 2009;5(3-
:146-52.
Allen, C. Practical Guide to Evidence. London, Cavendish,
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843143086
Sheldon D. The admissibility of psychiatric and psychological
evidence. Scots Law Times. 1992;301.
R v. Turner [1975] Q. B, 834. See also, Lowery v. R
3 All ER, 662
Freckelton, I. R. (1987). The Trial of the Expert. Melbourne,
Oxford University. See also, Head, A. (1996).
“A Judge’s Analysis.” N.L.J 146 (6770): 11723.
de Keijser J, Elffers H. Understanding of forensic expert
reports by judges, defense lawyers and forensic
professionals. Psychol Crime Law. 2012;18(2):191-
https://doi.org/10.1080/10683161003736744
Brownlie AR. Expert Evidence in the Light of Preece
v. HM Advocate. Med Sci Law. 1982;22(4):237-44.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002580248202200404
Gabber, H. A. The Medical Report and its Affect in
Proof in Criminal and Civil Cases. Cairo, El Matboaat
Press. 1991.
R v. Angela Cannings [2004] 2 Cr. App. R, 7, EWCA
Crim, 1
Murrie DC, Boccaccini MT, Guarnera LA, Rufino KA.
Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained
them?. Psychol Sci. 2013;24(10):1889-97. See also, Giannelli
PC. The abuse of scientific evidence in criminal
cases: The need for independent crime laboratories. Va
J Soc Pol’y & L. 1996;4:439.
Ahmed, A. A. Truth Between the General Islamic Philosophy
and the Philosophy of Criminal Proof. Cairo,
El Nahda. 1987.
Erhouma, M. M. (1999). Admissibility of Scientific
Evidence in Criminal Jurisdiction. 1999.
R v. Maguire and others [1992] 2 W.L.R, 767. R v.
Kiszko [1992] The Independent, February 18. R v.
McKenzie [1993] 1 W.L.R, 453. R v. Ward [1993] 2 All
ER 577, [1993] 1 W.L.R, 619.
Sharpe S. Electronically Recorded Evidence: A guide
to the use of tape and video recordings in criminal and
civil proceedings. Fourmat Pub.; 1989.
Mahendara, B. “Science in the Miscarriage of Justice.”
N.L.J 151 (7008):2001; 16
Abdou, F. E. The Authority of Criminal judge in Assessing
Guilt. Cairo, Cairo University.1995.
Somers, A. “Expert Witnesses.” The Lawyer April 10.
Choo AL. Evidence: Text and Materials. Addison-
Wesley Longman Limited; 1998. Eggleston R. What
is wrong with the adversary system?. AUSTL. LJ.
;49:428-31. Ellison LE. A comparative study
of rape trials in adversarial and inquisitorial criminal
justice systems (Doctoral dissertation, University of
Leeds). Donaldson L, Kaplan C, Leung WC. The Medical
Expert Witness: Time to regulate conflicts of interest.
Med Sci Law. 1999;39(1):11-6. Lempert RO, Saltzburg
SA. A modern approach to evidence: text, problems,
transcripts and cases. West Group; 1982. Pattenden R.
CONFLICTING APPROACHES TO PSYCHIATRIC
EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS-ENGLAND,
CANADA AND AUSTRALIA. Crim L Rev. 1986:92-
Schum DA. Thoughts about a science of evidence.
Ben younis, H. M, Criminal Evidence in the Libyan
Law and Justice, Al Nahda, Cairo, Egypt.
Howard MN. THE NEUTRAL EXPERT-A PLAUSIBLE
THREAT TO JUSTICE. Crim L Rev. 1991:98-
See also, Ellison LE. A comparative study of rape
trials in adversarial and inquisitorial criminal justice
systems (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).
Spencer JR. The Neutral Expert-an implausible bogey.
Crim L Rev. 1991:106-10.
Redmayne M. Expert Evidence and Criminal Justice:
Science, Rationality and Law (Doctoral dissertation,
University of Birmingham).
Freckelton, I. R. The Trial of the Expert. Melbourne,
Oxford University. 1987.
Usher, A. “The Expert Witness.” Med Sci Law. 1985;
https://doi.org/10.1177/002580248502500207
Gee DJ. The expert witness in the criminal trial. Crim L
Rev. 1987:307-14.
Ben Younis, H. M, Expert Evidence in Criminal Cases:
A Comparative Study, MMU, 2005.
Woolf, L. Access to Justice. 1996.
Levenbook BB. The Meaning of a Precedent. Legal
Theory. 2000;6(2):185-240. See also, Tregilgas-Davey
M. Miscarriages of justice within the English legal system.
New Law J. 1991;141:715-17.
Sommer, Ibid.
Berger CE, Buckleton J, Champod C, Evett IW, Jackson
G. Evidence evaluation: a response to the court of
appeal judgment in R v T. Sci Justice. 2011;51(2):43-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2011.03.005
Foster WL. Expert Testimony Prevalent Complaints
and Proposed Remedies. Harv L Rev. 1897;11:169.
Article details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You must read and accept the copyright terms and conditions(click here for copyright terms).