Damaging Similarities in Highly Skilled Signature Simulations - Their Detection and Authorship
Article content
Abstract
Questioned document examination is a highly specialized and challenging field of study, because of the variety and complexity of problems that are referred to document examiners. Detection and identification of practiced simulated forgeries is an area of forensic science which requires the professional skill, capability and acumen of an examiner, every time he (or she) is called upon to examine and report a case of this nature. This is because firstly, the practiced simulations bear a striking semblance to the copied model and usually contains the handwriting features of the writers, the real person as well as the forger, though in varying degrees.Secondly, the skilled forger rarely leaves his own imprint in the forgery he committed. Most authorities on the subject have advised that the identification of authorship, in such cases, may be considered as an exception rather than the rule. Besides discussing and reviewing the work done in this regard, the authors have also presented and illustrated an intricate case study where the authorship of simulated signatures could be associated with the known handwriting of the suspected forger
Keywords
Forensic Science, Handwriting, Signatures, Practiced Simulations, Identification, Forgery, Forensic Document Examiner
Downloads
References
Hilton O. Can the forger be identified from his handwriting?. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science. 1952 Nov 1;43(4):547-55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1139367
Osborn, A.S., Questioned Documents, Boyd Printing Co., Albany, New York (1929), pp. 17, 111, 129, 130, 146, 230, 270, 272, 273, 281, 282, 284, 285, 327 and 328.
Harralson, H.H., Miller, L.S., Huber and Headrick’s Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals, 2nd Edition, (2018), CRC press, London, New York, Washington D.C, pp259-263, 276-288.
Black JA. Simulated signatures–forgery by imitation. Journal of Forensic Identification. 1995;45(3):283-97.
Hilton O. The Detection of Forgery. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1931-1951). 1939 Nov 1;30(4):568-99. https://doi.org/10.2307/1136977
Levinson J. Questioned documents: A lawyer's handbook. Academic Press; 2001.
Kelly JS, Lindblom BS, editors. Scientific examination of questioned documents. CRC press; 2006 Apr 27.
Muehlberger RJ. Identifying simulations: practical considerations. Journal of Forensic Science. 1990 Mar 1;35(2):368-74. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS12838J
Ellen D, Day S, Davies C. Scientific examination of documents: methods and techniques. CRC Press; 2018 May 3. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429491917
Koppenhaver KM. Forensic document examination: principles and practice. Springer Science & Business Media; 2007 Dec 6.
Singh M, Singh S. Group of Simulated Signatures: Their Apparition and Authorship: A Case Study. International Journal of Forensic Document Examiners. 1999;5:441-5.
Conway JVP. Evidential Documents. Charles C Thomas, 1995, pp 27, 97.
Article details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You must read and accept the copyright terms and conditions(click here for copyright terms).