تقييم أداء مسحات القطن والنايلون المختلفة فيما يتعلق باستعادة الحمض النووي وتخزينه

al Oleiwi A, Hussain I, McWhorter A, Sutton R, King RSP. DNA recovery from latent fingermarks treated with an infrared fluorescent fingerprint powder. Forensic Science International. 2017;277. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.05.008

Hanson E, Haas C, Jucker R, Ballantyne J. Specific and sensitive mrna biomarkers for the identification of skin in ‘touch DNA’ evidence. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2012;6(5):548–58. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.01.004

Bonsu DO, Higgins D, Austin JJ. Forensic touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces – A Review. Science & Justice. 2020;60(3):206–15. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2020.01.002

van Oorschot RAH, Phelan DG, Furlong S, Scarfo GM, Holding NL, Cummins MJ. Are you collecting all the available DNA from touched objects? International Congress Series. 2003;1239:803–7. doi:10.1016/s0531-5131(02)00498-3

Meakin G, Jamieson A. DNA transfer: Review and implications for Casework. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2013;7(4):434–43. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.03.013

Hefetz I, Einot N, Faerman M, Horowitz M, Almog J. Touch DNA: The effect of the deposition pressure on the quality of Latent Fingermarks and STR profiles. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2019;38:105–12. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.016

van Oorschot RAH, Szkuta B, Meakin GE, Kokshoorn B, Goray M. DNA transfer in forensic science: A Review. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2019;38:140–66. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.014

Comte J, Baechler S, Gervaix J, Lock E, Milon M-P, Delémont O, et al. Touch DNA collection – performance of four different swabs. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2019;43:102113. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.06.014

van Oorschot RA, Ballantyne KN, Mitchell RJ. Forensic trace DNA: A Review. Investigative Genetics. 2010;1(1):14. doi:10.1186/2041-2223-1-14

Burrill J, Daniel B, Frascione N. A review of Trace “touch DNA” deposits: Variability factors and an exploration of cellular composition. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2019;39:8–18. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.019

Alketbi SK, Goodwin W. The effect of surface type, collection and extraction methods on touch DNA. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. 2019;7(1):704–6. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.145

Alketbi SK, Goodwin W. The effect of time and environmental conditions on touch DNA. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. 2019;7(1):701–3. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.144

Aloraer D, Hassan NH, Albarzinji B, Goodwin W. Collection protocols for the recovery of biological samples. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. 2015;5. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.083

Jansson L, Swensson M, Gifvars E, Hedell R, Forsberg C, Ansell R, et al. Individual shedder status and the origin of touch DNA. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2022;56:102626. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102626

Brownlow RJ, Dagnall KE, Ames CE. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three Qiagen extraction methods. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2011;57(3):713–7. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.02022.x

Adamowicz MS, Stasulli DM, Sobestanovich EM, Bille TW. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis. PloS one. 2014 Dec 30;9(12):e116351.

Garvin AM, Holzinger R, Berner F, Krebs W, Hostettler B, Lardi E, Hertli C, Quartermaine R, Stamm C. The forensiX evidence collection tube and its impact on DNA preservation and recovery. BioMed Research International. 2013 Jan 1;2013.

Mawlood SK, Alrowaithi M, Watson N. Advantage of forensix swabs in retrieving and preserving biological fluids. Journal of forensic sciences. 2015 May;60(3):686-9.

Phuengmongkolchaikij S, Panvisavas N, Bandhaya A. Alcohols as solution for delaying microbial degradation of biological evidence on cotton swabs. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. 2017 Dec 1;6:e539-41.