A New Secured E-Government Efficiency Model for Sustainable Services Provision
محتوى المقال
الملخص
E-government projects in some developing countries face many challenges to provide sustainable services for e-efficiency. Literature shows that most governments suffer from lack of technology and restrictions associated with budgets and human resources. These factors constitute the main obstacles impeding the effective implementation of sustainable and secured e-government services. In addition to these obstacles, the e-government efficiency models adopted by some developing countries do not deliver an appropriate strategic plan for disseminating all sustainable and secured e-government services. Therefore, this paper proposes a new secured model for e-government efficiency to provide sustainable and e-efficiency services. This goal can be achieved using five determinants: detailed process, streamlined services, quick accessibility, use of latest techniques, and trust and awareness, which are discussed in this study. The proposed model has been validated by using a pilot study conducted through case study and method of application and implementation. The findings indicate that both service providers such as governments and users of e-government services took advantage of the proposed model. Accordingly, sustainable e-government services may increase.
الكلمات المفتاحية
Cybersecurity، Secure E-Government، E-Government Efficiency Model، Sustainable Services، Trust، Awareness، Reliability
التنزيلات
المراجع
K. Layne and J. Lee, “Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model,” in Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 122-136, June 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1.
C. G. Reddick, “A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities,” in Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 51-64, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2003.11.004.
P. R. Joshi and S. Islam, “E-Government Maturity Model for Sustainable E-Government Services from the Perspective of Developing Countries,” in Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 6, June 5, 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10061882.
D. I. Zahran, H. A. Al-Nuaim, M. J. Rutter and D. Benyon, “A Critical Analysis of E-Government Evaluation Models at National and Local Municipal Levels,” in EJEG, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 28-42, 2015.
H. Scholta, W. Mertens, M. Kowalkiewicz and J. Becker, “From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: An e-government stage model,” in Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 11-26, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.010.
J. Sangki, “Vision of future e-government via new e-government maturity model: Based on Korea’s e-government practices,” in Telecommun. Policy, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 860-871, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2017.12.002.
S. Khanra and R. P. Joseph, “E-Governance Maturity Models: A Meta-ethnographic Study,” in Int. Technol. Manag. Rev., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-9, Apr. 23, 2019, doi: 10.2991/itmr.b.190417.001.
N. P. Rana, Y. K. Dwivedi, B. Lal, M.D. Williams and M. Clement, “Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view,” in Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 19. no. 3, pp. 549-568, Nov. 24, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10796-015-9613-y.
B. Estermann, “Development paths towards open government – an empirical analysis among heritage institutions,” in Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 599-612, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.005.
V. López-López, S. Iglesias-Antelo, A. Vázquez-Sanmartín, R. Connolly and F. Bannister, “e-Government, Transparency & Reputation: An Empirical Study of Spanish Local Government,” in Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 276-293, Aug. 24, 2018, doi: 10.1080/10580530.2018.1503792.
R. Cullen and G. Hassall, Eds. Achieving Sustainable E-Government in Pacific Island States. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-50972-3.
D. Linders, C. Z.-P. Liao and C.-M. Wang, “Proactive e-Governance: Flipping the service delivery model from pull to push in Taiwan,” in Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. S86-S76, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.004.
A. Das, H. Singh and D. Joseph, “ A longitudinal Study of e-government maturity,” in Inf. & Manag., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 415-426, June 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2016.09.006.
A. Ingrams, A. Manoharan, L. Schmidthuber & M. Holzer, “Stages and Determinants of E-Government Development: A Twelve-Year Longitudinal Study of Global Cities,” in Int. Public Manag. J., vol. 0, no.0, Sep. 27, 2018, doi: 10.1080/10967494.2018.1467987
J. Yadav, A. K. Saini and A. K. Yadav, “Measuring citizens engagement in e-Government projects – Indian perspective,” in J. Stat. Manag. Syst., vol. 22, no. 2, Mar. 08, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09720510.2019.1580908.
M. A. Sánchez and J. I. Zuntini, “Digital readiness in government: the case of Bahía Blanca municipal government,” in Int. J. Electron. Gov., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 155-181, Aug. 07, 2019, doi: 10.1504/IJEG.2019.101500.
Y. K. Majdalawi, T. Almarabeh and Hiba Mohammad, “E-Government Strategy and Plans in Jorden,” in J. Soft. Eng. Appl., vol. 8, no. 4, 2015, doi: 10.4236/jsea.2015.84022
G. D. Molero, F. E. Santarremigia, S. Poveda-Reyes, M. Mayrhofer, S. Awad- Núñez and A. Kassabji, “Key factors for the implementation and integration of innovative ICT solutions in SMEs and large companies involved in the multimodal transport of dangerous goods,” in Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., vol. 11, June 11, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s12544-019-0362-8.
O. M. Okunola, J. Rowley and F. Johnson, “The multi-dimensional digital divide: prepectives from an e-government portal in Nigeria,” in Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 34, no. 2, Apr. 2017, pp. 329-339, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.002.
D. R. Hancock and B. Algozzine. Doing Case Study Research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press, 2006.
S. J. Tracy, 2nd ed. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crefting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2020.
تفاصيل المقال
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.