Social Work in Cybersecurity : Insight Into Human Factors
Article content
Abstract
The modern cyberspace features complex and highly evolving threats against users and particular vulnerable groups, such as youths and children. Rather than being a purely technical domain, cyber-security is a complex and multi-dimensional field that requires comprehensive evaluations and understanding of human behavior, social dynamics, and prevailing organizational structures, especially considering the increasingly sophisticated nature of cybercrimes in today’s society. To be effective, cyber-security requires critical considerations of current and evolving human factors and processes, including the complex processes of interactions between technology and human belief-thought-behavior patterns, in protection, detection, response, and recovery programs. This study applies a review and synthesis of relevant findings in a sample of 25 credible sources to demonstrate and prove the critical and special value and place of social work, as a field, in cyber-security and its goals. Findings in the review show that social work has special value in effective cyber-security programs, based on its unique capacity to mobilize useful societal and human knowledge and resources to confront and address the complex and evolving nature of cyber-threats from a holistic approach. This value rests on social work’s foundations and fields of practice, particularly the person-in-environment and human behavior in a social environment (HBSE) models, social work policy practice, forensic and clinical social work, and community development. Collaborations between social work and information/computing sciences based on these foundations/fields of social work represent an important pathway toward more productive, sustainable, impactful, and socially just cyber-security programs in the modern society.
Keywords
cybersecurity, human behavior, information security, layers of cyberspace, psychological and environmental factors, social work
Downloads
References
Arceneaux, and M. Harman, “Social cyber-security: A policy framework for addressing computational propaganda”, Journal of Information Warfare, vol.20, no.3, 2021. https://www.jinfowar.com/journal/volume-20-issue-3/social-cybersecurity-policy-framework-addressing-computational-propaganda
J. Burton, and C. Lain, “Desecuritisingcybersecurity: Towards a societal approach, Journal of Cyber Policy, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23738871.2020.1856903
S. R. Muller, and D. N. Burrell, “Social Cyber-security and Human Behavior”, International Journal of Hyper-connectivity and the Internet of Things, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2022, doi: 10.4018/IJHIoT.305228.
J. W. Bullee, and M. Junger, Social engineering, in T. Holt, and A. M. Bossler, Ed., The Palgrave handbook of international cybercrime and cyber-deviance, Geneva, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90307-1_38-1
N. Duarte, N. Coelho, and T. Guarda, Social engineering: The art of attacks, 2021. https://comum.rcaap.pt/bitstream/10400.26/38593/1/paper17.pdf
Z. Wang, L Sun, and H. Zhu, “Defining social engineering in cyber-security”, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp.85094-85115, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992807
H. Loiseau, D. Ventre, and H. Aden, Cybersecurity in Humanities and Social Sciences: A Research Methods Approach. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2020.
V. Koutroubas, and M. Galanakis, “Bandura’s social learning theory and its importance in the organizational psychology context”, Psychology Research, vol.12, no.6, pp.315-322, 2022, doi: 10.17265/2159-5542/2022.06.001
T. Mogashoa, “Applicability of constructivist theory in qualitative educational research”, American International Journal of Contemporary Research, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 51-59, 2014.
V. I. Akpan, U. A. Igwe, I. B. Mpamah, and C. O. Okoro, “Social constructivism: Implications on teaching and learning”, British Journal of Education, vol. 8, no. 8, pp.49-56, 2020, https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Social-Constructivism.pdf
K. M. Carley “Social cyber-security: An emerging science”, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, vol.26, pp. 365-381, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-020-09322-9
K. Carley, The science of social cyber-security. MobiCom 18, New Delhi, India, 2018. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3241539.3241587
M. F. Diaz, A. Charry, S. Sellitti, M. Ruzzante, K. Enciso, and S. Burkat, “Psychological factors influencing pro-environmental behavior in developing countries: Evidence from Colombian and Nicaraguan students, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580730
N. P. Sharma, and V. Gupta, Human behavior in a social environment, Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574501/#:~:text=Psychological%20contributors%3A%20These%20include%20temperament,%2C%20socioeconomic%20status%2C%20and%20relationships.
S. L. Burton, and P. D. Moore, “Pig butchering in cyber-security: A modern social engineering threat”, Socio-Economic Challenges, vol.8, no.3, pp.46-60, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.61093/sec.8(3).46-60.2024
International Federation of Social Workers, Global definition of social work, IFSW, n.d. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/ (accessed October 21, 2024)
A. M. Syed, Social engineering: Concepts, techniques, and security countermeasures, 2021, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2107.14082
G. M. Tefera, M. Lembani, I. David, and W. Majee, “COVID-19 and migrant coping strategies: A person in environment perspective on experiences of Malawian migrants living in South Africa”, Journal of Social Service Research, vol.49, no.4, pp.447-460, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2023.2236140
C. Munson, “Forensic social work practice standards: Definition and specification”, Journal of Forensic Social Work, vol.1, pp.37-60, 2011, doi: 10.1080/1936928X.2011.541200
T. Maschi, and G. S. Leibowitz, Forensic social work: Psychosocial and legal issues across diverse populations and settings, 2nd edition. New York, NY, USA: Springer Publishing, 2017.
F. O’Brien, I. Hawthorne-Steele, K. M. Pascoe, R. Moreland, E. Cownie, and C. Killick, “Bridging the gap between social work and community development: Implementing a post-graduate training partnership”, Social Work Education, 1–18, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2023.2252844
Canadian Association of Social Workers, Social work practice in community development, CASW, n.d. https://www.casw-acts.ca/en/social-work-practice-community-development#:~:text=Role%20and%20responsibilities&text=Provide%20counselling%20to%20individuals%2C%20couples,develop%20and%20evaluate%20community%20programs (accessed October 21, 2024)
Columbia University, New York, The diversity of social work: How shared experiences shape the field, Columbia University, 2023. https://socialwork.columbia.edu/news/diversity-social-work-how-shared-experiences-shape-field (accessed October 21, 2024)
Spring Arbor University, The importance of diversity in social work, Spring Arbor University, 2024. https://online.arbor.edu/news/importance-diversity-social-work (accessed October 21, 2024)
A. M. Syed, Social engineering: Concepts, techniques, and security countermeasures, 2021, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2107.14082
Article details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You must read and accept the copyright terms and conditions(click here for copyright terms).