Article content

Ghadi M. A. Alzahrani Nizar H. Alsharif Moez Krichen

Abstract

Network security is a critical concern for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), often lacking resources for comprehensive solutions. This study evaluates three open-source network intrusion detection systems (NIDS): Snort, Suricata, and Zeek, to assess their suitability for SMEs. Using a controlled, virtualized environment, we simulated realistic SME network conditions and subjected each NIDS to tests measuring their ability to handle high traffic volumes and various attack types, including DoS, malware, ransomware, and phishing. Results showed that Suricata consistently outperformed the others in scalability, resource efficiency, and detection accuracy, achieving high true positive rates while minimizing false positives, which is essential for reducing alert fatigue among SME users. Snort 3, optimized with afpacket and hyperscan, also demonstrated strong capabilities but required more resources, while Snort 2 struggled with high-volume traffic. Although Zeek is lightweight, it was less effective in signature-based detection but excelled in monitoring anomalies. This study provides insights to guide SMEs in selecting appropriate NIDS based on their specific requirements and emphasizes the need for ongoing optimization and further research in physical environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. Park and S. Ahn, “Performance comparison and detection analysis in snort and suricata environment,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 94, pp. 241–252, 2017.

N. Rawindaran, A. Jayal, E. Prakash, and C. Hewage, “Perspective of small and medium enterprise (sme’s) and their relationship with government in overcoming cybersecurity challenges and barriers in wales,” International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 100191, 2023.

F. A. Logic, “What is a network ids and why do you need it?” 10 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.alertlogic.com/blog/what-isa-network-ids-and-why-do-you-need-it/

E. Tsukerman, “What is an intrusion detection system (ids),” Designing a Machine Learning Intrusion Detection System, 2020.

A. Chidukwani, S. Zander, and P. Koutsakis, “A survey on the cyber security of small-to-medium businesses: Challenges, research focus and recommendations,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, p. 85701–85719, 2022.

Y. Tayyebi and D. Bhilare, “A comparative study of open source network based intrusion detection systems,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. IJCSIT, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 23–26, 2018.

C. Hoover, “Comparative study of snort 3 and suricata intrusion detection systems,” Master’s thesis, Undergraduate Honors Theses, Computer Science and Computer Engineering, 2022.

A. Waleed, A. F. Jamali, and A. Masood, “Which open-source ids? snort, suricata or zeek,” Computer Networks, vol. 213, p. 109116, 2022.

S. A. R. Shah and B. Issac, “Performance comparison of intrusion detection systems and application of machine learning to snort system,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 80, pp. 157–170, 2018.

O. H. Abdulganiyu, T. Ait Tchakoucht, and Y. K. Saheed, “A systematic literature review for network intrusion detection system (ids),” International Journal of Information Security, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1125–1162, 2023.

S. B. Chalmers, “Comparison of different security tools to detect risks in networks,” International Journal Of Computer Sciences and Mathematics Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2022.

A. Alhomoud, R. Munir, J. P. Disso, I. Awan, and A. Al-Dhelaan, “Performance evaluation study of intrusion detection systems,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 5, pp. 173–180, 2011.

D. Day and B. Burns, “A performance analysis of snort and suricata network intrusion detection and prevention engines,” in Fifth International Conference on Digital Society, Gosier, Guadeloupe, 2011, pp. 187–192.

E. Albin and N. C. Rowe, “A realistic experimental comparison of the suricata and snort intrusion-detection systems,” in 2012 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, 2012, pp. 122–127.

R. Padmashani, S. Sathyadevan, and D. Dath, “Bsnort IPS better snort intrusion detection/prevention system,” in 2012 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA). IEEE, 2012, pp. 46–51.

W. Bulajoul, A. James, and M. Pannu, “Network intrusion detection systems in high-speed traffic in computer networks,” in 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on E-Business Engineering, 2013, pp. 168–175.

J. S. White, T. Fitzsimmons, and J. N. Matthews, “Quantitative analysis of intrusion detection systems: Snort and suricata,” in Cyber Sensing 2013, vol. 8757. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2013, p. 875704.

M. Saber, M. G. Belkasmi, S. Chadli, M. Emharraf, and I. El Farissi, “Implementation and performance evaluation of intrusion detection systems under high-speed networks,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Big Data, Cloud and Applications, 2017, pp. 1–6.

A. Gupta and L. S. Sharma, “Performance evaluation of snort and suricata intrusion detection systems on ubuntu server,” in Proceedings of ICRIC 2019, 2020, pp. 811–821.

Q. Hu, M. R. Asghar, and N. Brownlee, “Evaluating network intrusion detection systems for high-speed networks,” in 2017 27th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC). IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–6.

Q. Hu, S.-Y. Yu, and M. R. Asghar, “Analysing performance issues of open-source intrusion detection systems in high-speed networks,” Journal of Information Security and Applications, vol. 51, p. 102426, 2020.

A. P. Wahyu, K. Fauziah, A. S. Nahrowi, M. N. Faiz, and A. W. Muhammad, “Strengthening network security: Evaluation of intrusion detection and prevention systems tools in networking systems,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 14, no. 9, 2023.

A. A. E. Boukebous, M. I. Fettache, G. Bendiab, and S. Shiaeles, “A comparative analysis of snort 3 and suricata,” in 2023 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Emerging Technologies (GlobConET). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–6.

Article details

Section
Original Research articles
Copyright Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

      You must read and accept the copyright terms and conditions(click here for copyright terms).