Analyzing Autoencoder-Based Intrusion Detection System Performance : Impact of Hidden Layers
محتوى المقال
الملخص
The rise in cyberattacks targeting critical network infrastructure has spurred an increased emphasis on the development of robust cybersecurity measures. In this context, there is a growing exploration of effective Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) that leverage Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL), with a particular emphasis on autoencoders. Recognizing the pressing need to mitigate cyber threats, our study underscores the crucial importance of advancing these methodologies. Our study aims to identify the optimal architecture for an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) based on autoencoders, with a specific focus on configuring the number of hidden layers. To achieve this objective, we designed four distinct sub-models, each featuring a different number of hidden layers: Test 1 (one hidden layer), Test 2 (two hidden layers), Test 3 (three hidden layers), and Test 4 (four hidden layers).We subjected our models to rigorous training and testing, maintaining consistent neuron counts of 30 and 60. The outcomes of our experimental study reveal that the model with a single hidden layer consistently outperformed its counterparts, achieving an accuracy of 95.11% for NSL-KDD and an impressive 98.6% for CIC-IDS2017. The findings of our study indicate that our proposed system is viable for implementation on critical network infrastructure as a proactive measure against cyber-attacks.
الكلمات المفتاحية
Cybercrime، Autoencoder، Decode، Encode، Bottleneck، Neurons، IDS
التنزيلات
المراجع
N. Alam and M. Ahmed, “Zero-day Network Intrusion Detection using Machine Learning Approach,” no. April, pp. 194–201, 2023.
W. E. N. Xu, J. Jang-jaccard, A. Singh, and F. Sabrina, “Improving Performance of Autoencoder-Based Network Anomaly Detection on NSL-KDD Dataset,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 140136–140146, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3116612.
R. Panigrahi et al., “A consolidated decision tree-based intrusion detection system for binary and multiclass imbalanced datasets,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.3390/math9070751.
A. Ahmim, M. Derdour, and M. A. Ferrag, “An intrusion detection system based on combining probability predictions of a tree of classifiers,” Int. J. Commun. Syst., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1–17, 2018, doi: 10.1002/dac.3547.
R. A. R. Ashfaq, X. Z. Wang, J. Z. Huang, H. Abbas, and Y. L. He, “Fuzziness based semi-supervised learning approach for intrusion detection system,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 378, pp. 484–497, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.04.019.
M. A. Rezvi, S. Moontaha, K. A. Trisha, S. T. Cynthia, and S. Ripon, “Data mining approach to analyzing intrusion detection of wireless sensor network,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 516–523, 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v21.i1.pp516-523.
S. N. Mighan and M. Kahani, “A novel scalable intrusion detection system based on deep learning,” Int. J. Inf. Secur., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 387–403, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10207-020-00508-5.
D. Karthikeyan, V. Mohanraj, Y. Suresh, and J. Senthilkumar, “An efficient stacking model with SRPF classifier technique for intrusion detection system,” Int. J. Commun. Syst., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1002/dac.4737.
M. R. Ayyagari, N. Kesswani, M. Kumar, and K. Kumar, “Intrusion detection techniques in network environment: a systematic review,” Wirel. Networks, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1269–1285, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11276-020-02529-3.
Z. M. Khan and H. Singh, “Deep Neural Network Solution for Detecting Intrusion in Network,” no. August, pp. 160–171, 2023.
A. Issa and Z. Albayrak, “DDoS Attack Intrusion Detection System Based on Hybridization of CNN and LSTM,” no. January, 2023, doi: 10.12700/APH.20.3.2023.3.6.
J. Han and W. Pak, “applied sciences Hierarchical LSTM-Based Network Intrusion Detection System Using Hybrid Classification,” 2023.
J. Han and W. Pak, “High Performance Network Intrusion Detection System Using Two-Stage LSTM and Incremental Created Hybrid Features,” 2023.
A. A. Megantara and T. Ahmad, “A hybrid machine learning method for increasing the performance of network intrusion detection systems,” J. Big Data, vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40537-021-00531-w.
P. Pitre, “An Intrusion Detection System for Zero-Day Attacks to Reduce False Positive Rates,” pp. 1–6, 2022.
S. Dwivedi, M. Vardhan, and S. Tripathi, “Building an efficient intrusion detection system using grasshopper optimization algorithm for anomaly detection,” Cluster Comput., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1881–1900, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10586-020-03229-5.
C. Haripriya and M. P. P. Jagadeesh, “An Efficient Autoencoder-based Deep Learning Technique to Detect Network Intrusions,” vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.14456/ITJEMAST.2022.142.
M. Sabir, J. Ahmad, and D. Alghazzawi, “A Lightweight Deep Autoencoder Scheme for Cyberattack Detection in the Internet of Things,” 2023, doi: 10.32604/csse.2023.034277.
O. Tabanlı and D. Öğrenme, “Detection of Attacks in Network Traffic with the Autoencoder-Based Unsupervised Learning Method,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 199–207, 2022, doi: 10.26650/acin.1142806.
Z. Gu, L. Wang, C. Liu, and Z. Wang, “Network Intrusion Detection with Nonsymmetric Deep Autoencoding Feature Extraction,” vol. 2021, 2021.
M. Schmidt, “theRepository at St . Cloud State Autoencoder-Based Representation Learning to Predict Anomalies in Computer Networks,” 2020.
H. Hosseinvand, “Intrusion Detection System Using SVM as Classifier and GA for Optimizing Feature Vectors,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 26–35, 2018.
M. Awais, “Deep Learning Based Anomaly Detection for Fog-Assisted IoVs Network,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, no. January, pp. 19024–19038, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3246660.
Y. Song, S. Hyun, and Y. G. Cheong, “Analysis of autoencoders for network intrusion detection†,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 1–23, 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21134294.
S. Rezvy, Y. Luo, M. Petridis, and A. Lasebae, “An efficient deep learning model for intrusion classification and prediction in 5G and IoT networks”.
E. M. Maseno, Z. Wang, and H. Xing, “A Systematic Review on Hybrid Intrusion Detection System,” vol. 2022, 2022.
M. Tavallaee, E. Bagheri, W. Lu, and A. A. Ghorbani, “A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set in Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications,” Comput. Intell. Secur. Def. Appl., no. Cisda, pp. 1–6, 2009.
S. Sindian and S. Sindian, “An Enhanced Deep Autoencoder-based Approach for DDoS Attack Detection 3 Deep Neural Network 2 Related Work,” vol. 15, pp. 716–724, 2020, doi: 10.37394/23203.2020.15.72.
M. Gharib and B. Mohammadi, “AutoIDS : Auto-encoder Based Method for Intrusion Detection System,” pp. 1–9.
C. Ieracitano, A. Adeel, F. C. Morabito, and A. Hussain, “A Novel Statistical Analysis and Autoencoder Driven Intelligent Intrusion Detection Approach,” Neurocomputing, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.016.
تفاصيل المقال
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.