The Comparative Influence of Culture and Schooling Environment on Handwriting Features

Monika Saini, Anup K. Kapoor


Handwriting is an acquired trait of an individual which is primarily culture and environment dependent. The present study attempts to assess the relative influence of schooling environment and culture upon handwriting features. The paper sets forth the computational and conventional analysis of handwriting samples obtained from two cultural/ethnic groups in India living in the same and different geographical regions. Striking significant differences were observed in key handwriting features between writers of the same cultures who were living in different regions and attended different school settings. Contrary to this, handwriting features were insignificant between writers of different cultures living in the same region at the same school. 


Forensic Sciences, Environment, Culture, Handwriting Features, Conventional, Computational

Full Text:



Huber RA, Headrick AM. Handwriting identification:

facts and fundamentals. CRC press; 1999 Apr 15.

Tylor EB. Primitive culture: researches into the development

of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and

custom. J. Murray; 1871.

Saini M. Handwriting Variations among Indian Population

[Doctoral Thesis]. Department of Anthropology,

University of Delhi, Delhi, India; 2016.

Cusack CT, Hargett JW. A comparison study of

the handwriting of adolescents. Forensic Sci Int.



Turner IJ, Sidhu RK, Love JM. A preliminary study

investigating class characteristics in the Gurmukhi

handwriting of 1st and 2nd generation Punjabis. Sci

Justice. 2008;48(3):126-32.

scijus.2007.10.011, PMid:18953800

Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R. Image pre-processing. In-

Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision 1993

(pp. 56-111). Springer US.


Koppenhaver KM. Forensic document examination:

principles and practice. Springer Science & Business

Media; 2007 Dec 6.

Srihari SN, Cha SH, Arora H, Lee S. Individuality of

handwriting: a validation study. InDocument Analysis

and Recognition, 2001. Proceedings. Sixth International

Conference on 2001 (pp. 106-109). IEEE. https://doi.


Saini M, Kapoor AK. Conventional and computational

features in document examination. J Forensic Sci Criminol.


Osborn AS. Questioned Documents: A Study of Questioned

Documents with an Outline of Methods by which

the Facts May be Discovered and Shown. Lawyers’ cooperative

publishing Company; 1910.

Muehlberger RJ, Newman KW, Regent J, Wichmann

JG. A statistical examination of selected handwriting

characteristics. J Forensic Sci. 1977;22(1):206-15.

Pervouchine V, Leedham G. Extraction and Analysis

of Document Examiner Features from Vector Skeletons

of Grapheme ‘th’. InInternational Workshop

on Document Analysis Systems 2006 Feb 13 (pp.

-207). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.


Leedham G, Pervouchine V. Validating the use of handwriting

as a biometric and its forensic analysis. Inthe

Proceedings of International Workshop on Document

Analysis (IWDA), India 2005 (pp. 175-192).

Leedham CG, Pervouchine V, Tan WK. Quantitative

letter-level extraction and analysis of features used by

document examiners. J forensic document examination.


Simon JC. Off-line cursive word recognition. Proceedings

of the IEEE. 1992;80(7):1150-61. https://doi.


Tsai DM, Lin CT. Fast normalized cross correlation

for defect detection. Pattern Recognit Lett.



Feingold S. Schools are writing off cursive. The Times

of India. 2013 October 6:11.

Noronha M. Students still care for good handwriting.

The Times of India. 2011 May 19: 13.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.